67% of commercial insurance providers want property data exchange Appetite for data has grown for 64% of respondents
By FF Newsroom · 6 September 2018

A new research study of commercial property insurance providers by LexisNexis Risk Solutions[i] has identified a clear appetite for a centralised data exchange comprising property information, policy history and past property claims data from across the market to support quoting and underwriting activities. However, while the majority of those surveyed would like access to a contributory database, only just over half of the respondents in the study would readily contribute. LexisNexis experts saw this same hurdle among personal lines insurers who now benefit from industrywide data sharing.
The study found an increasing need for data enrichment amongst commercial property insurance providers with 64% saying this interest has increased in the past year. Almost all (99%) of the commercial property insurance providers surveyed use some form of location-based data to enrich quotation and underwriting processes, with flood and fire data used most often. Visualisation tools such as LexisNexis® Map View have played a key role in helping property insurers understand environmental risks. Furthermore, three out of four commercial property insurance providers (74%) currently use the past policy data they hold to enrich the quoting and underwriting processes.
Although close to seven out of ten of commercial property insurance providers (67%) would support a market-wide centralised contributory database through which insurance providers could share policy, property and/or claims data, only 57% of the commercial insurance providers surveyed would be very or somewhat likely to contribute to such a database.
The LexisNexis Risk Solutions study of the UK Commercial Property Insurance market found:
- 67% of respondents want a contributory database allowing multiple insurance providers to share data related to policies, properties or claims
- 53% said they thought an industry-wide contributory database for past policy data (including, for example, details of mid-term cancellations or of gaps in cover) would be extremely or very useful to their organisations
- 57% of providers said their company would be very (26%) or somewhat (31%) likely to contribute their data to a shared database
- 74% use past policy data (including details of mid-term cancellations or of gaps in cover) to support quoting and underwriting
- 64% of respondents said their current level of interest in, or need for, data enrichment is greater than in the past