One-Third of Consumers Using AI for Pension Decisions as FCA Releases Landmark Mills Review
By Lauren Towner · 7 July 2026

Quick Summary
The FCA's Mills Review reveals that 29% of UK consumers are already using AI for pension decisions, often without regulatory guardrails. As artificial intelligence in finance accelerates, experts warn that current pension infrastructure must modernize to ensure AI tools provide accurate, reliable guidance for retirement planning.
How is AI for pension decisions changing the retirement landscape?
AI for pension decisions is no longer a future concept; it is a current reality for nearly a third of savers. The Mills Review highlights that consumer retirement planning is being transformed by automated tools, with pensions ranking as the third most common financial product managed via AI. However, this rapid adoption has occurred ahead of formal regulation, leaving many users without formal legal recourse should automated advice lead to poor financial outcomes.
- 29% of engaged savers used AI last year.
- Pensions are the 3rd most popular AI-assisted financial product.
- Users currently lack regulatory protection for AI-led decisions.
What are the risks of using artificial intelligence in finance?
While artificial intelligence in finance offers efficiency, its efficacy is limited by the quality of underlying data. The UK pension system currently suffers from months-long transfer delays and fragmented data across "lost pots," which can cause AI models to provide misleading or incomplete guidance. Without a trusted official source of information, AI tools may struggle to navigate the complex web of overlapping tax rules that define the British retirement system.
- AI risks "flattering to deceive" due to poor system data.
- Complexity of overlapping tax rules remains a barrier.
- Lack of a single dashboard for all savings hinders AI accuracy.
How should regulators respond to the Mills Review?
The FCA is urged to implement urgent safety guardrails to protect the growing number of consumers relying on non-regulated AI tools. Industry leaders suggest that rather than restricting technology, the regulator should focus on creating a trusted AI framework that integrates with a functional, modernized pension system. Becky O'Connor of PensionBee notes that the "genie is out of the bottle," making rapid regulatory formalization the only viable path forward for retail financial services.
FF NEWS TAKE:
This report proves that AI for pension decisions has moved faster than the regulators could have anticipated. The fact that 29% of savers are already bypassing traditional advice for AI tools is a massive wake-up call for the industry. It moves the needle by shifting the conversation from "if" we should use AI to "how" we fix the broken back-end data systems that currently make AI guidance a risky gamble for consumers.
Companies in this story: PensionBee, Financial Conduct Authority
People in this story: Rebecca O'Connor, Sheldon Mills